Search for: All records

The Nama Group (Kalahari Craton) is an archetypal stratigraphic record of the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition. The upper Schwarzrand Subgroup preserves key biostratigraphic markers of this interval, including erniettomorphs, cloudinomorphs, and trace fossils, yet has a complex stratigraphic architecture due to deposition in a foreland basin. Here, we describe the stratigraphy of the upper Schwarzrand Subgroup of the Nama Basin, and collate sedimentologic, geochronologic, carbon isotope chemostratigraphic, and biostratigraphic data. We argue that strata previously identified as the Nomtsas Formation in the Witputs Subbasin are lithostratigraphically and tectonostratigraphically distinct from those in the type area (Farm Nomtsas) in the Zaris Subbasin. Therefore, we introduce the Swartkloofberg Formation as a new name for the terminal Schwarzrand Subgroup in the Witputs Subbasin. While carbonates of the underlying Urusis Formation were deposited within shallow marine environments, the Swartkloofberg Formation records a transition to dominantly siliciclastic deposition, mostly below fair-weather wave base, and with extensive evidence of slope instability. High-relief stromatolite reefs formed diachronously at different localities within both the Urusis and Swartkloofberg formations due to laterally variable accommodation space within the foreland basin. Strata of the Swartkloofberg Formation are interpreted as flysch deposits within an underfilled basin. We propose that the distinct deltaic peritidal and shoreface strata that—in some localities—were previously assigned to the upper Nomtsas Formation, are placed within the unconformably overlying molasse deposits of the Fish River Subgroup. These strata contain the stratigraphically lowest identified occurrences ofTreptichnus pedumwithin the Nama Group, and thus the base of the Cambrian Period. This stratigraphic revision solves several longstanding issues with regional correlation and revises the position of the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary in the Witputs Subbasin. Accordingly, the Swartkloofberg Formation in the Witputs Subbasin (538.5–<537.6 Ma) is Ediacaran in age, as defined by biostratigraphy, supporting recent interpretations that the base of the Cambrian Period may be younger than 537.6 Ma. With increasingly refined age-stratigraphic models for the Nama Group, the upper Schwarzrand Subgroup provides a high-resolution record of the evolution of increasingly complex benthic invertebrate behaviors in the terminal Ediacaran lead-up to the classical Cambrian radiation of biomineralized invertebrate phyla. 

Understanding the role of humans as ‘ecosystem engineers’ requires a deep-time perspective rooted in evolutionary history and the fossil record. However, no con-ceptual framework exists for studying the rise of ecosystem engineering in deep time, requiring us to consider effects that fall outside the scope of traditional defini-tions. Here, we present a new framework applicable to both modern and ancient engineering-type effects. We propose a new term – ‘Earth system engineering’ – to describe biological processes that alter the structure and function of planetary spheres, and which combines core tenets of ecosystem engineering, niche construction, and legacy effects. We illustrate this framework using the fossil record, and show how it can be applied across the tree of life, and throughout Earth history. 

Himatiichnus manganoigen. et isp. nov., a new trace fossil from the late Ediacaran Huns Member of the Urusis Formation, southern Namibia, comprises intertwining tubes exhibiting dual lineation patterns and reminiscent of both modern and early Cambrian examples of priapulid worm burrows. These similarities support the interpretation of a total-group scalidophoran tracemaker forH. mangano, thus providing direct evidence for the first appearance date of Scalidophora in the late Ediacaranca539 Ma. This new material is thus indicative of the presence of total-group scalidophorans below the Cambrian boundary and supports inference of a lengthy Precambrian fuse for the Cambrian explosion. 

Abstract Following various assignments to Archaeocyatha, worm tubes, and finallyincertae sedis, the enigmatic Ediacaran–Cambrian taxonArchaeichnium haughtonihas in recent years come to represent somewhat of a wastebasket taxon to which the indeterminate tapering tubular forms common across this interval are assigned. This ‘catch‐all’ status has been aided in part by both suboptimal specimen photography and the temporary loss of the holotype after its second redescription in 1978. Recent rediscovery of theA. haughtoniholotype in the collections of the Iziko South African Museum in Cape Town has enabled a much‐needed re‐assessment of this critical and cryptic taxon, with results suggesting that this material from the latest Ediacaran or earliest Cambrian of Namibia is among the earliest fossil record examples of marine worm burrow linings, and the oldest examples of linings robust enough to withstand exhumation and current transport. These traces indicate the emergence of this important animalian ecosystem engineering behaviour closer to the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary than previously thought.